I don't understand the love for this film. It has its moments for sure but few and far between. I've mentioned before, as in my review for Steve Jobs (2015) (which I loved), that Danny Boyle is very hit or miss for me. But 28 Days Later (2002), which I seem to recall liking more when I saw it in the theater and on DVD, is mostly just annoying to me now. I detest the cheap-looking DV/camcorder look (as much as I couldn't stand it when David Lynch did the same for his 2006 film Inland Empire [ review ] ). The cinematography is poor, the editing is annoyingly fast and confusing, and the action is sloppy. Not to mention, the rate of infection is absurdly rapid in a film that otherwise shoots for realism. The performances are mostly good and the film works best during its "human" moments. But it's such a rollercoaster of quality—starts off really bad, works okay for a while as an eerie post-apocalyptic movie, gets good when it becomes a road movie, get...